Re: rel="nofollow"
"John Bokma" wrote in message
news:Xns966E7F6681C20castleamber@130.133.1.4...
> [1] she mistakenly took a webpage for *the* netiquette
Not really, just that, that site felt the same way I did as to how a sig
should look. π
Re: rel="nofollow"
Stacey wrote:
> "John Bokma" wrote in message
[color=green]
>> In some cases I do, of course. And in many cases I write a lot of it
>> π
>
> I have not seen a message here that you have written it all yourself.[/color]
Can you define "here"?
[color=green]
>> if someone asks a question, and I write a reply I did the real work.
>
> Really, so does everone else who answers the question.[/color]
Did I state different?
[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>> Ah, I remember, Google no, but "etc"?
>>>
>>> Yeah, I cut because
>>
>> Removing everything is not nice.[/color]
>
> It is nicer than going through the whole c**p again!:-)[/color]
But you do both, you remove everything *and* go to the whole c**p again.
So either quote as is considered polite, or ignore the posting(s). If
you consider them just c**p, why reply?
[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> What are approved standards of social or professional behavior? Do
>>> you know?
>>
>> You considered mine not professional, hence unethical ;-)[/color]
>
> Does that answer my question of what are the approved standards?:-)[/color]
Does that matter? One meaning of unprofessional is:
"Not conforming to the standards of a profession: unprofessional
behavior."
Moreover, you at first tried to state that my sig didn't conform the
netiquette (by quoting a web page on which the author made some stuff up
and called it netiquette). I am aware that netiquette is not a standard,
but how many standards of a profession are official standards? (E.g. ISO
approved for example).
So since you first tried to prove that my sig was not according to the
netiquette (which comes close enough to a standard in Usenet
communications), failed, and next called it unprofessional, I think that
sums it up to unethical.
--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html
Re: rel="nofollow"
"John Bokma" wrote in message
news:Xns966E89E31C087castleamber@130.133.1.4...
> Stacey wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "John Bokma" wrote in message
>[color=darkred]
>>> In some cases I do, of course. And in many cases I write a lot of it
>>> π
>>
>> I have not seen a message here that you have written it all yourself.[/color]
>
> Can you define "here"?[/color]
This NG.
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> if someone asks a question, and I write a reply I did the real work.
>>
>> Really, so does everyone else who answers the question.[/color]
>
> Did I state different?[/color]
Implied. *I* did the real work.
[color=green]
>>
>> It is nicer than going through the whole c**p again!:-)
>
> But you do both, you remove everything *and* go to the whole c**p again.
> So either quote as is considered polite, or ignore the posting(s). If
> you consider them just c**p, why reply?[/color]
I am not going through everything that was in the message.
π
Stacey
Re: rel="nofollow"
Stacey wrote:
> "John Bokma" wrote in message
> news:Xns966E7F6681C20castleamber@130.133.1.4...
>
>
>[color=green]
>> [1] she mistakenly took a webpage for *the* netiquette
>
> Not really, just that, that site felt the same way I did as to how a sig
> should look. :-)[/color]
No, you claimed it was netiquette.
--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html
Re: rel="nofollow"
Stacey wrote:
> This NG.
You even replied to it :-D.
--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html
Re: rel="nofollow"
"John Bokma" wrote in message
news:Xns966E913AB539Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4...
> Stacey wrote:
>[color=green]
>> This NG.
>
>
> You even replied to it :-D.[/color]
If I replied to it you didn't write it all yourself. π I didn't say you
never started a posting.
Stacey
Re: rel="nofollow"
Stacey wrote:
> "John Bokma" wrote in message
> news:Xns966E913AB539Ecastleamber@130.133.1.4...[color=green]
>> Stacey wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> This NG.
>>
>>
>> You even replied to it :-D.[/color]
>
> If I replied to it you didn't write it all yourself. :-)[/color]
I wrote the original post myself, so all the content (the body) in the
original post was written by me.
--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html